Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Sweden
Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square was 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Sweden, 1970–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2021, adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Sweden stood at 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 52 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 497.5% on the previous year and up 40.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Sweden peaked at 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 41.65 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1971.
Sweden ranks 11th of 216 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Sweden, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 54.92 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 41.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 1972 | 43.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1973 | 192.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +338.9% |
| 1974 | 270.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.9% |
| 1975 | 61.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.2% |
| 1976 | 108.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.3% |
| 1977 | 108.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1978 | 80.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.2% |
| 1979 | 200.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.5% |
| 1980 | 184.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 1981 | 101.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.0% |
| 1982 | 77.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 1983 | 82.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1984 | 62.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 1985 | 70.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 1986 | 43.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.5% |
| 1987 | 96.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +122.4% |
| 1988 | 762.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +688.3% |
| 1989 | 823.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1990 | 371.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.0% |
| 1991 | 142.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.7% |
| 1992 | 123.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 1993 | 135.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1994 | 223.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.3% |
| 1995 | 298.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.5% |
| 1996 | 75.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.6% |
| 1997 | 273.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +260.6% |
| 1998 | 143.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.6% |
| 1999 | 117.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.8% |
| 2000 | 178.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.6% |
| 2001 | 115.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.0% |
| 2002 | 48.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.4% |
| 2003 | 60.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 2004 | 295.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +391.1% |
| 2005 | 625.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +111.7% |
| 2006 | 1,545 current US$ per square kilometre | +146.9% |
| 2007 | 2,035 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.7% |
| 2008 | 1,541 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 2009 | 697.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.8% |
| 2010 | 4,435 current US$ per square kilometre | +536.2% |
| 2011 | 6,352 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.2% |
| 2012 | 1,719 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.9% |
| 2013 | 1,170 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.9% |
| 2014 | 874.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 2015 | 783.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2016 | 959.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 2017 | 1,730 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.2% |
| 2018 | 2,021 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 2019 | 1,348 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 2020 | 1,493 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 2021 | 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre | +497.5% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Sweden changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | +688.3% | 96.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 762.44 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 2010 | +536.2% | 697.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 4,435 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 2021 | +497.5% | 1,493 current US$ per square kilometre | 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 2004 | +391.1% | 60.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 295.61 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 116.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 41.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 270.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 230.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 43.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 823.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 190.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 75.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 371.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 714.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 48.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,035 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2,139 current US$ per square kilometre | 783.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 6,352 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 5,208 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,493 current US$ per square kilometre | 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Sweden
- 8 Panama 10,644 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 India 9,945 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 South Africa 8,991 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Australia 8,918 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Uzbekistan 8,734 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Burkina Faso 8,636 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Sweden
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.62 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.12 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 8.03 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.012 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 757.39 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 19.15 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -37.67 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0286 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 1,807 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 18.58 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Sweden?
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Sweden was 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square recorded in Sweden?
- The highest recorded value was 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square recorded in Sweden?
- The lowest recorded value was 41.65 current US$ per square kilometre in 1971.
- How does Sweden rank for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Sweden ranks 11th out of 216 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square rising or falling in Sweden?
- Over the last ten years it is up 40.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sweden data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.