Australia vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Australia
8,918 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sweden
8,922 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Australia rank
12th
Sweden rank
11th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Australia
  • Sweden
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197019952021

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,918 current US$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 4 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sweden ahead.

Australia ranks 12th and Sweden ranks 11th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 57.57 current US$ per square kilometre 116.26 current US$ per square kilometre 58.69 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 121.52 current US$ per square kilometre 230.65 current US$ per square kilometre 109.12 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 174.43 current US$ per square kilometre 190.31 current US$ per square kilometre 15.88 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 875.16 current US$ per square kilometre 714.28 current US$ per square kilometre 160.88 current US$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 2,080 current US$ per square kilometre 2,139 current US$ per square kilometre 59.63 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 5,979 current US$ per square kilometre 5,208 current US$ per square kilometre 771.78 current US$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Australia or Sweden?
Sweden, at 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,918 current US$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Australia and Sweden?
4 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sweden?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Australia and Sweden rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Australia ranks 12th and Sweden ranks 11th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/sweden/">Australia vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.