Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square was 8,734 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Uzbekistan, 1992–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Uzbekistan is 8,734 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2021. That is the highest value across all 30 years on record.
That represents a change of up 37.9% on the previous year and up 37.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Uzbekistan peaked at 8,734 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1998.
Uzbekistan ranks 13th of 216 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 292.33 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 269.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 1994 | 250.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1995 | 58.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.8% |
| 1996 | 38.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.6% |
| 1997 | 42.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 1998 | 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.3% |
| 1999 | 17.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.1% |
| 2000 | 29.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.4% |
| 2001 | 14.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.2% |
| 2002 | 28.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.1% |
| 2003 | 36.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.3% |
| 2004 | 150.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +317.0% |
| 2005 | 165.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2006 | 1,004 current US$ per square kilometre | +504.7% |
| 2007 | 1,419 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.4% |
| 2008 | 2,318 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.4% |
| 2009 | 2,664 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 2010 | 4,001 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.2% |
| 2011 | 6,334 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.3% |
| 2012 | 6,098 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 2013 | 4,975 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 2014 | 4,284 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 2015 | 3,666 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 2016 | 4,392 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 2017 | 3,638 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 2018 | 5,076 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.5% |
| 2019 | 3,977 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 2020 | 6,334 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.3% |
| 2021 | 8,734 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.9% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's 8,734 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 4.09 current US$ per square kilometre, 2134.5× the median. (47 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Uzbekistan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | +504.7% | 165.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,004 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 2004 | +317.0% | 36.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 150.9 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 122.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 292.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 782.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,664 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 4,644 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,638 current US$ per square kilometre | 6,334 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 7,534 current US$ per square kilometre | 6,334 current US$ per square kilometre | 8,734 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
- 10 South Africa 8,991 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Sweden 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Australia 8,918 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Burkina Faso 8,636 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Indonesia 7,653 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 China 6,030 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Uzbekistan
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 4.35 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 5.5 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 158.18 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0011 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 4.27 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 4.40 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 47.86 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0299 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 118.7 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 19.33 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Uzbekistan?
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Uzbekistan was 8,734 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 8,734 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 13.12 current US$ per square kilometre in 1998.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Uzbekistan ranks 13th out of 216 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 37.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 30 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.