South Africa vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

South Africa
8,991 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sweden
8,922 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Africa rank
10th
Sweden rank
11th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • South Africa
  • Sweden
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197019952021

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 8,991 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 69 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 10th and Sweden ranks 11th of 216 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 248.1 current US$ per square kilometre 116.26 current US$ per square kilometre 131.84 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 1,704 current US$ per square kilometre 230.65 current US$ per square kilometre 1,473 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 837.64 current US$ per square kilometre 190.31 current US$ per square kilometre 647.34 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 1,426 current US$ per square kilometre 714.28 current US$ per square kilometre 711.96 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 2,779 current US$ per square kilometre 2,139 current US$ per square kilometre 639.58 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 5,898 current US$ per square kilometre 5,208 current US$ per square kilometre 690.71 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, South Africa or Sweden?
South Africa, at 8,991 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between South Africa and Sweden?
69 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sweden?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do South Africa and Sweden rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
South Africa ranks 10th and Sweden ranks 11th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/sweden/">South Africa vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.