Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Panama
Panama: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square was 10,644 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Panama, 1970–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Panama is 10,644 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2021. That is the highest value across all 52 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 920.0% on the previous year and up 2,020.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Panama peaked at 10,644 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1970.
Panama ranks 8th of 216 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Panama, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1990 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1992 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1994 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1995 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1996 | 0.4297 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1997 | 0.7098 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.2% |
| 1998 | 16.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +2284.0% |
| 1999 | 22.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.5% |
| 2000 | 28.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.5% |
| 2001 | 11.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.4% |
| 2002 | 30.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +178.7% |
| 2003 | 46.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.9% |
| 2004 | 86.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.6% |
| 2005 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2006 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2007 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2008 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2009 | 123.04 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2010 | 189.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.3% |
| 2011 | 501.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +164.5% |
| 2012 | 636.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 2013 | 392.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.4% |
| 2014 | 369.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2015 | 168.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.4% |
| 2016 | 55.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.9% |
| 2017 | 50.12 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2018 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2019 | 971.41 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2020 | 1,044 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2021 | 10,644 current US$ per square kilometre | +920.0% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Panama changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | +2284.0% | 0.7098 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.92 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 2021 | +920.0% | 1,044 current US$ per square kilometre | 10,644 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 32.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 123.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 333.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 971.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 5,844 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,044 current US$ per square kilometre | 10,644 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Panama
- 5 Philippines 15,450 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Ghana 14,493 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Peru 11,701 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 India 9,945 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 South Africa 8,991 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Sweden 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Panama
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.82 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 4 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps -870.79 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit -0.0096 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita -190.5 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 938.47 million BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -55.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0104 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 205.3 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate -8.97 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Panama?
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Panama was 10,644 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square recorded in Panama?
- The highest recorded value was 10,644 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square recorded in Panama?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1970.
- How does Panama rank for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Panama ranks 8th out of 216 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square rising or falling in Panama?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2,020.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Panama data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.