Panama vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Panama
10,644 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sweden
8,922 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Panama rank
8th
Sweden rank
11th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Panama
  • Sweden
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197019952021

How they compare

Panama currently reports 10,644 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 1,722 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sweden ahead.

Panama ranks 8th and Sweden ranks 11th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 116.26 current US$ per square kilometre 116.26 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 230.65 current US$ per square kilometre 230.65 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 4.06 current US$ per square kilometre 190.31 current US$ per square kilometre 186.24 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 32.66 current US$ per square kilometre 714.28 current US$ per square kilometre 681.62 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 333.54 current US$ per square kilometre 2,139 current US$ per square kilometre 1,806 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 5,844 current US$ per square kilometre 5,208 current US$ per square kilometre 635.96 current US$ per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Panama or Sweden?
Panama, at 10,644 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Panama and Sweden?
1,722 current US$ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Sweden?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Panama and Sweden rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Panama ranks 8th and Sweden ranks 11th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/panama/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/panama/sweden/">Panama vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.