Sweden vs Uzbekistan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Sweden
8,922 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Uzbekistan
8,734 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sweden rank
11th
Uzbekistan rank
13th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Sweden
  • Uzbekistan
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197019952021

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,734 current US$ per square kilometre in Uzbekistan, a difference of 188 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

Sweden ranks 11th and Uzbekistan ranks 13th of 216 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 173.74 current US$ per square kilometre 122.86 current US$ per square kilometre 50.88 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 714.28 current US$ per square kilometre 782.99 current US$ per square kilometre 68.71 current US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan
2010s 2,139 current US$ per square kilometre 4,644 current US$ per square kilometre 2,505 current US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan
2020s 5,208 current US$ per square kilometre 7,534 current US$ per square kilometre 2,327 current US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Sweden or Uzbekistan?
Sweden, at 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,734 current US$ per square kilometre in Uzbekistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Sweden and Uzbekistan?
188 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Uzbekistan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Sweden and Uzbekistan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Sweden ranks 11th and Uzbekistan ranks 13th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Uzbekistan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sweden/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sweden/uzbekistan/">Sweden vs Uzbekistan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.