Burkina Faso vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Burkina Faso
8,636 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Sweden
8,922 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Burkina Faso rank
14th
Sweden rank
11th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Sweden
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197019952021

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,636 current US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 286 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sweden ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 14th and Sweden ranks 11th of 216 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 116.26 current US$ per square kilometre 116.26 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 6.45 current US$ per square kilometre 230.65 current US$ per square kilometre 224.19 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 6.16 current US$ per square kilometre 190.31 current US$ per square kilometre 184.14 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 50.47 current US$ per square kilometre 714.28 current US$ per square kilometre 663.81 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 1,482 current US$ per square kilometre 2,139 current US$ per square kilometre 657.19 current US$ per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 5,372 current US$ per square kilometre 5,208 current US$ per square kilometre 164.16 current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Burkina Faso or Sweden?
Sweden, at 8,922 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,636 current US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Burkina Faso and Sweden?
286 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sweden?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Burkina Faso and Sweden rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Burkina Faso ranks 14th and Sweden ranks 11th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/sweden/">Burkina Faso vs Sweden: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.