Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Chile
Chile: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre was 90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Chile, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Chile recorded 90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in 2023.
The figure is down 4.7% on the previous year and up 0.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Chile peaked at 94,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 4,435 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, in 1976.
Chile ranks 80th of 160 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre in Chile, year by year
| Year | constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 5,238 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 5,880 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 1963 | 6,748 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 1964 | 6,364 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 1965 | 5,979 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 1966 | 6,172 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1967 | 6,304 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1968 | 6,900 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1969 | 7,248 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1970 | 7,716 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1971 | 7,537 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1972 | 6,023 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -20.1% |
| 1973 | 5,660 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 1974 | 6,742 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 1975 | 5,206 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -22.8% |
| 1976 | 4,435 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -14.8% |
| 1977 | 5,120 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 1978 | 6,010 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +17.4% |
| 1979 | 7,022 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +16.9% |
| 1980 | 8,561 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 1981 | 9,995 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 1982 | 6,167 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -38.3% |
| 1983 | 5,240 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 1984 | 6,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 1985 | 6,848 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1986 | 7,014 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1987 | 8,897 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +26.8% |
| 1988 | 9,929 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 1989 | 12,573 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +26.6% |
| 1990 | 13,247 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1991 | 13,339 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1992 | 16,244 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 1993 | 19,673 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 1994 | 19,825 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1995 | 26,607 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +34.2% |
| 1996 | 28,680 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1997 | 31,283 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1998 | 32,363 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1999 | 27,339 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 2000 | 31,248 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 2001 | 32,277 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2002 | 33,391 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2003 | 36,608 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2004 | 39,078 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2005 | 48,376 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 2006 | 54,918 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2007 | 60,232 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2008 | 75,803 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 2009 | 57,025 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -24.8% |
| 2010 | 71,197 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +24.9% |
| 2011 | 81,990 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +15.2% |
| 2012 | 91,953 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 2013 | 89,954 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2014 | 81,986 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 2015 | 83,682 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2016 | 79,886 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2017 | 79,890 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 87,622 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2019 | 88,692 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2020 | 72,891 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -17.8% |
| 2021 | 93,438 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 2022 | 94,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2023 | 90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,315 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 5,238 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 7,248 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 6,147 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 4,435 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 7,716 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 8,145 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 5,240 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 12,573 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 22,860 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 13,247 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 32,363 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 46,896 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 31,248 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 75,803 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 83,685 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 71,197 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 91,953 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 87,874 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 72,891 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 94,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 77 Bosnia and Herzegovina 116,804 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 78 Montenegro 111,962 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 79 Ecuador 97,240 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 81 Kiribati 88,734 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 82 Comoros 87,934 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
- 83 Morocco 86,192 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Chile
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.04 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.32 Percent per annum (2029)
- Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 8.93 % change on previous year (2025)
- Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.2056 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per capita 3,700 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (current US$), annual growth rate 9.24 % change on previous year (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.3042 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (current US$), per capita 5,474 current US$ per person (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (current LCU), annual growth rate 10.14 % change on previous year (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (current LCU), per unit of GDP 289.4 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Chile?
- Gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre in Chile was 90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 94,800 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 4,435 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in 1976.
- How does Chile rank for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
- Chile ranks 80th out of 160 countries with data for 2023.
- Is gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Gross capital formation Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.