Chile vs Kiribati: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Chile
90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
88,734 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
80th
Kiribati rank
81st

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Kiribati
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 88,734 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 1,635 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 80th and Kiribati ranks 81st of 160 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 61,994 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,841 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 35,153 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 83,685 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 57,135 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,551 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 87,874 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 64,002 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 23,872 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Kiribati?
Chile, at 90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 88,734 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Kiribati?
1,635 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kiribati?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Chile and Kiribati rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 80th and Kiribati ranks 81st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Kiribati: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/kiribati/">Chile vs Kiribati: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.