Chile vs Morocco: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Chile
90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
86,192 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
80th
Morocco rank
83rd

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Morocco
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 86,192 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 4,177 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 80th and Morocco ranks 83rd of 160 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Morocco in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 6,656 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,653 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,003 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 6,147 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,113 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,966 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 8,145 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,904 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,759 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 22,860 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 23,380 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 520.29 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2000s 46,896 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 45,461 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,434 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 83,685 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 75,756 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,929 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 87,874 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 83,451 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,424 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Morocco?
Chile, at 90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 86,192 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Morocco?
4,177 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Morocco?
58 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2023.
How do Chile and Morocco rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 80th and Morocco ranks 83rd of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Morocco: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/morocco/">Chile vs Morocco: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.