Chile vs Montenegro: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Chile
90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro
111,962 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
80th
Montenegro rank
78th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Montenegro
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 111,962 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 21,593 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 80th and Montenegro ranks 78th of 160 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 61,994 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 72,672 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,678 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Montenegro
2010s 83,685 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 73,765 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,920 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 87,874 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 101,402 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,527 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 111,962 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Montenegro?
21,593 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Montenegro?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Chile and Montenegro rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 80th and Montenegro ranks 78th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Montenegro: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/montenegro/">Chile vs Montenegro: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.