Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
116,804 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
77th
Chile rank
80th

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Chile
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 116,804 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 26,435 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.3 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 77th and Chile ranks 80th of 160 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Chile Difference Ahead
2000s 58,889 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 46,896 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,993 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 75,303 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 83,685 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,382 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 107,362 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 87,874 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,488 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Chile?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 116,804 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 90,369 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?
26,435 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile rank globally for gross capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 77th and Chile ranks 80th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/chile/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
200 places, 7,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.