Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square in Cuba
Cuba: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square was 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per in Cuba, 1990–2020
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per in 2020. That is the highest value across all 31 years on record.
The figure is up 12.8% on the previous year and up 97.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per in Cuba peaked at 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 564.86 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1997.
Cuba ranks 86th of 178 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 31 years of available data.
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square in Cuba, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 798.47 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 695.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 1992 | 666.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1993 | 741.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1994 | 897.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.9% |
| 1995 | 839.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1996 | 584.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.3% |
| 1997 | 564.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1998 | 581.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1999 | 606.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 2000 | 598.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2001 | 585.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2002 | 571.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2003 | 581.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2004 | 572.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2005 | 595.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2006 | 590.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2007 | 632.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2008 | 655.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2009 | 711.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 2010 | 736.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2011 | 811.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2012 | 909.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2013 | 1,006 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2014 | 1,088 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 2015 | 1,196 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2016 | 1,217 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2017 | 1,259 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2018 | 1,261 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2019 | 1,289 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2020 | 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.8% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1,396 current US$ per square kilometre, 1.0× the median. (53 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1,328 current US$ per square kilometre, 1.1× the median. (30 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 697.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 564.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 897.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 609.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 571.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 711.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,077 current US$ per square kilometre | 736.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,289 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 83 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1,584 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 84 Burkina Faso 1,570 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 85 Albania 1,475 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 87 Malawi 1,450 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 88 Bahamas 1,447 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 89 Senegal 1,441 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Cuba
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2016)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 0 units per person (2016)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2016)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 0 units per person (2016)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (1969)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2016)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per capita 0 units per person (2016)
- IMF holdings of currency, SDR, annual growth rate -100 % change on previous year (1969)
- IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2016)
- IMF holdings of currency, SDR, per capita 0 units per person (2016)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per in Cuba?
- Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per in Cuba was 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 564.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 1997.
- How does Cuba rank for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
- Cuba ranks 86th out of 178 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 97.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.