Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cuba: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Bosnia and Herzegovina
1,584 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cuba
1,454 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
83rd
Cuba rank
86th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Cuba
05001.0k1.5k199020052021

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1,584 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 130 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Cuba ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 83rd and Cuba ranks 86th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Cuba in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Cuba Difference Ahead
1990s 301.78 current US$ per square kilometre 679.14 current US$ per square kilometre 377.36 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 1,029 current US$ per square kilometre 609.45 current US$ per square kilometre 419.6 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 1,409 current US$ per square kilometre 1,077 current US$ per square kilometre 331.54 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 1,496 current US$ per square kilometre 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre 42.59 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Cuba?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1,584 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cuba?
130 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cuba?
27 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cuba rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 83rd and Cuba ranks 86th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cuba: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/cuba/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cuba: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.