Cuba vs Malawi: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square
Cuba
1,454 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Malawi
1,450 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cuba rank
86th
Malawi rank
87th
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time
- Cuba
- Malawi
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,450 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 4 current US$ per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 86th and Malawi ranks 87th of 178 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 697.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 499.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 198.14 current US$ per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2000s | 609.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 675.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 65.6 current US$ per square kilometre | Malawi |
| 2010s | 1,077 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,041 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.67 current US$ per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2020s | 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,459 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.28 current US$ per square kilometre | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Cuba or Malawi?
- Cuba, at 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,450 current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Cuba and Malawi?
- 4 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malawi?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and Malawi rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
- Cuba ranks 86th and Malawi ranks 87th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.