Bahamas vs Cuba: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Bahamas
1,447 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Cuba
1,454 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Bahamas rank
88th
Cuba rank
86th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Bahamas
  • Cuba
05001.0k1.5k199020052021

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,447 current US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 7 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Cuba ahead.

Bahamas ranks 88th and Cuba ranks 86th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Cuba in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Cuba Difference Ahead
1990s 753.72 current US$ per square kilometre 686.43 current US$ per square kilometre 67.29 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2000s 1,175 current US$ per square kilometre 609.45 current US$ per square kilometre 565.53 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2010s 1,436 current US$ per square kilometre 1,077 current US$ per square kilometre 358.55 current US$ per square kilometre Bahamas
2020s 1,450 current US$ per square kilometre 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre 3.38 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Bahamas or Cuba?
Cuba, at 1,454 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,447 current US$ per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2020.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Bahamas and Cuba?
7 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Cuba?
30 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2020.
How do Bahamas and Cuba rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Bahamas ranks 88th and Cuba ranks 86th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Cuba: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/cuba/">Bahamas vs Cuba: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.