Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square in Eswatini
Eswatini: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square was 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square in Eswatini, 1990–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square in Eswatini is 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2021. That is the highest value across all 32 years on record.
The figure is up 17.8% on the previous year and up 144.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square in Eswatini peaked at 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 394.53 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1990.
That places Eswatini 147th out of 208 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 394.53 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1991 | 417.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1992 | 451.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1993 | 480.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1994 | 519.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 1995 | 559.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1996 | 425.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.0% |
| 1997 | 567.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.4% |
| 1998 | 617.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1999 | 701.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 2000 | 744.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 2001 | 688.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 2002 | 726.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2003 | 769.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2004 | 808.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2005 | 892.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 2006 | 926.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2007 | 988.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 2008 | 983.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2009 | 1,124 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 2010 | 1,080 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2011 | 1,145 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2012 | 1,228 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2013 | 1,410 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 2014 | 1,468 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2015 | 1,557 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2016 | 1,754 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 2017 | 1,936 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2018 | 2,073 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2019 | 2,276 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2020 | 2,372 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2021 | 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.8% |
Eswatini compared with similar countries
- Eswatini's 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Eswatini's 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 899.68 current US$ per square kilometre, 3.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square in Eswatini changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | +33.4% | 425.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 567.91 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 513.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 394.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 701.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 865.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 688.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,124 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1,593 current US$ per square kilometre | 1,080 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,276 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2,583 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,372 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 144 Kazakhstan 3,228 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 145 East Timor 3,079 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 146 Canada 2,878 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 148 Argentina 2,747 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 149 Rwanda 2,746 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 150 Gambia 2,741 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Eswatini
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, annual growth rate -56.26 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0008 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 3.28 units per person (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, annual growth rate -58.35 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 2.4 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate -25.48 % change on previous year (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0191 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per capita 78.44 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, SDR, annual growth rate -29.04 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square in Eswatini?
- Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square in Eswatini was 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 394.53 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- How does Eswatini rank for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
- Eswatini ranks 147th out of 208 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is up 144.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.