Eswatini vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Eswatini
2,794 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
East Timor
3,079 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eswatini rank
147th
East Timor rank
145th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Eswatini
  • East Timor
01.0k2.0k3.0k199020052021

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 3,079 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 285 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 147th and East Timor ranks 145th of 208 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 902.37 current US$ per square kilometre 322.29 current US$ per square kilometre 580.07 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 1,593 current US$ per square kilometre 1,130 current US$ per square kilometre 462.91 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 2,583 current US$ per square kilometre 2,800 current US$ per square kilometre 217.85 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Eswatini or East Timor?
East Timor, at 3,079 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Eswatini and East Timor?
285 current US$ per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and East Timor?
20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
How do Eswatini and East Timor rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Eswatini ranks 147th and East Timor ranks 145th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/timor-leste/">Eswatini vs East Timor: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.