Argentina vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Argentina
2,747 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eswatini
2,794 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Argentina rank
148th
Eswatini rank
147th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Argentina
  • Eswatini
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k3.0k199020052021

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,747 current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 47 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 148th and Eswatini ranks 147th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 644.08 current US$ per square kilometre 513.6 current US$ per square kilometre 130.48 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 1,215 current US$ per square kilometre 865.18 current US$ per square kilometre 349.99 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 2,232 current US$ per square kilometre 1,593 current US$ per square kilometre 639.02 current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 2,540 current US$ per square kilometre 2,583 current US$ per square kilometre 42.59 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Argentina or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,747 current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Argentina and Eswatini?
47 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Eswatini?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Argentina and Eswatini rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Argentina ranks 148th and Eswatini ranks 147th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/eswatini/">Argentina vs Eswatini: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.