Eswatini vs Gambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square

Eswatini
2,794 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Gambia
2,741 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Eswatini rank
147th
Gambia rank
150th

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) … square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Gambia
01.0k2.0k3.0k199020052021

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,741 current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 53 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 147th and Gambia ranks 150th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Gambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Gambia Difference Ahead
1990s 513.6 current US$ per square kilometre 325.69 current US$ per square kilometre 187.91 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 865.18 current US$ per square kilometre 810.46 current US$ per square kilometre 54.72 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 1,593 current US$ per square kilometre 1,728 current US$ per square kilometre 135.54 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 2,583 current US$ per square kilometre 2,594 current US$ per square kilometre 11.9 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square, Eswatini or Gambia?
Eswatini, at 2,794 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,741 current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square between Eswatini and Gambia?
53 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gambia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
How do Eswatini and Gambia rank globally for adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current us$), per square?
Eswatini ranks 147th and Gambia ranks 150th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Gambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-carbon-dioxide-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/gambia-the/">Eswatini vs Gambia: Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
208 places, 6,698 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.