Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre in Chile
Chile: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre was 38.52 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre in Chile, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Chile stood at 38.52 million current LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 5.0% on the previous year and up 111.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Chile peaked at 38.52 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.2021 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
Chile ranks 22nd of 195 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre in Chile, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2021 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.2382 current LCU per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1963 | 0.334 current LCU per square kilometre | +40.2% |
| 1964 | 0.4186 current LCU per square kilometre | +25.3% |
| 1965 | 0.6287 current LCU per square kilometre | +50.2% |
| 1966 | 1.15 current LCU per square kilometre | +83.5% |
| 1967 | 1.58 current LCU per square kilometre | +36.9% |
| 1968 | 1.92 current LCU per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1969 | 2.6 current LCU per square kilometre | +35.5% |
| 1970 | 4.58 current LCU per square kilometre | +76.5% |
| 1971 | 4.49 current LCU per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1972 | 8.06 current LCU per square kilometre | +79.6% |
| 1973 | 44.09 current LCU per square kilometre | +447.1% |
| 1974 | 459.36 current LCU per square kilometre | +941.9% |
| 1975 | 1,851 current LCU per square kilometre | +302.9% |
| 1976 | 6,971 current LCU per square kilometre | +276.6% |
| 1977 | 19,665 current LCU per square kilometre | +182.1% |
| 1978 | 35,088 current LCU per square kilometre | +78.4% |
| 1979 | 59,610 current LCU per square kilometre | +69.9% |
| 1980 | 84,664 current LCU per square kilometre | +42.0% |
| 1981 | 109,893 current LCU per square kilometre | +29.8% |
| 1982 | 82,563 current LCU per square kilometre | -24.9% |
| 1983 | 123,807 current LCU per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1984 | 192,422 current LCU per square kilometre | +55.4% |
| 1985 | 284,706 current LCU per square kilometre | +48.0% |
| 1986 | 552,253 current LCU per square kilometre | +94.0% |
| 1987 | 738,357 current LCU per square kilometre | +33.7% |
| 1988 | 796,326 current LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 1989 | 973,888 current LCU per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 1990 | 1.35 million current LCU per square kilometre | +38.8% |
| 1991 | 1.74 million current LCU per square kilometre | +28.9% |
| 1992 | 2.33 million current LCU per square kilometre | +33.6% |
| 1993 | 2.98 million current LCU per square kilometre | +28.3% |
| 1994 | 3.34 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1995 | 3.98 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 1996 | 5.10 million current LCU per square kilometre | +28.3% |
| 1997 | 5.65 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 1998 | 6.17 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1999 | 5.92 million current LCU per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2000 | 6.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2001 | 6.88 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2002 | 7.21 million current LCU per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2003 | 7.48 million current LCU per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2004 | 8.00 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2005 | 9.11 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 2006 | 10.08 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2007 | 11.44 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2008 | 12.81 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2009 | 11.51 million current LCU per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2010 | 13.77 million current LCU per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 2011 | 15.63 million current LCU per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 2012 | 17.25 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2013 | 18.24 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2014 | 19.94 million current LCU per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2015 | 21.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2016 | 22.82 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2017 | 24.30 million current LCU per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 2018 | 26.06 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2019 | 26.35 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2020 | 26.50 million current LCU per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2021 | 34.28 million current LCU per square kilometre | +29.4% |
| 2022 | 36.69 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2023 | 38.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.01 current LCU per square kilometre | 0.2021 current LCU per square kilometre | 2.6 current LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 12,371 current LCU per square kilometre | 4.49 current LCU per square kilometre | 59,610 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 393,888 current LCU per square kilometre | 82,563 current LCU per square kilometre | 973,888 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.86 million current LCU per square kilometre | 1.35 million current LCU per square kilometre | 6.17 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 9.10 million current LCU per square kilometre | 6.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | 12.81 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 20.59 million current LCU per square kilometre | 13.77 million current LCU per square kilometre | 26.35 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 34.00 million current LCU per square kilometre | 26.50 million current LCU per square kilometre | 38.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 19 Mauritius 42.37 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 20 Tanzania, United Republic of 41.63 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 21 Burundi 39.89 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 23 Armenia 36.11 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 24 Rwanda 35.19 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 25 Sri Lanka 27.71 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Chile
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.04 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.32 Percent per annum (2029)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate 10.51 % change on previous year (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP 0.2712 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita 4,879 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- External balance on goods and services (current US$), annual growth 28.24 % change on previous year (2025)
- External balance on goods and services (current LCU), annual growth 29.29 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), annual -1.22 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 32.85 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 591,096 current LCU per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Chile?
- Taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Chile was 38.52 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 38.52 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2021 current LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Chile rank for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Chile ranks 22nd out of 195 countries with data for 2023.
- Is taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 111.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Taxes less subsidies on products Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.