Chile vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Chile
38.52 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
41.63 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
22nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
20th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 41.63 million current LCU per square kilometre against 38.52 million current LCU per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 3.11 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 22nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 20th of 195 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 3.86 million current LCU per square kilometre 277,586 current LCU per square kilometre 3.58 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2000s 9.10 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.72 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.38 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2010s 20.59 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.08 million current LCU per square kilometre 12.51 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2020s 34.00 million current LCU per square kilometre 31.76 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.23 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Chile or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 41.63 million current LCU per square kilometre against 38.52 million current LCU per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Chile and Tanzania, United Republic of?
3.11 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Chile and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 22nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 20th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/tanzania/">Chile vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.