Chile vs Mauritius: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre

Chile
38.52 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
42.37 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
22nd
Mauritius rank
19th

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Mauritius
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 42.37 million current LCU per square kilometre against 38.52 million current LCU per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 3.85 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Mauritius ahead.

Chile ranks 22nd and Mauritius ranks 19th of 195 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 30,334 current LCU per square kilometre 377,956 current LCU per square kilometre 347,622 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 393,888 current LCU per square kilometre 1.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.01 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 3.86 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 549,376 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 9.10 million current LCU per square kilometre 11.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.12 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 20.59 million current LCU per square kilometre 25.28 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.70 million current LCU per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 34.00 million current LCU per square kilometre 33.24 million current LCU per square kilometre 758,475 current LCU per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre, Chile or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 42.37 million current LCU per square kilometre against 38.52 million current LCU per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre between Chile and Mauritius?
3.85 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 22nd and Mauritius ranks 19th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mauritius: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/taxes-less-subsidies-on-products-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/chile/mauritius/">Chile vs Mauritius: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
196 places, 7,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.