Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre in Burundi
Burundi: Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre was 39.89 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre in Burundi, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Burundi stood at 39.89 million current LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 21.7% on the previous year and up 168.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Burundi peaked at 39.89 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 13,629 current LCU per square kilometre, in 1961.
Burundi ranks 21st of 195 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre in Burundi, year by year
| Year | current LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 13,629 current LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 13,629 current LCU per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 13,629 current LCU per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 23,851 current LCU per square kilometre | +75.0% |
| 1965 | 31,192 current LCU per square kilometre | +30.8% |
| 1966 | 34,346 current LCU per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1967 | 37,383 current LCU per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1968 | 45,678 current LCU per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 1969 | 45,249 current LCU per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 1970 | 62,064 current LCU per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 1971 | 55,962 current LCU per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 1972 | 58,594 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1973 | 64,805 current LCU per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 1974 | 77,699 current LCU per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 1975 | 85,849 current LCU per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1976 | 123,551 current LCU per square kilometre | +43.9% |
| 1977 | 248,384 current LCU per square kilometre | +101.0% |
| 1978 | 237,780 current LCU per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1979 | 307,153 current LCU per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 1980 | 242,227 current LCU per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 1981 | 175,942 current LCU per square kilometre | -27.4% |
| 1982 | 265,027 current LCU per square kilometre | +50.6% |
| 1983 | 257,722 current LCU per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1984 | 418,692 current LCU per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 1985 | 490,537 current LCU per square kilometre | +17.2% |
| 1986 | 548,209 current LCU per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1987 | 449,961 current LCU per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 1988 | 657,749 current LCU per square kilometre | +46.2% |
| 1989 | 840,654 current LCU per square kilometre | +27.8% |
| 1990 | 651,480 current LCU per square kilometre | -22.5% |
| 1991 | 867,952 current LCU per square kilometre | +33.2% |
| 1992 | 907,321 current LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1993 | 919,003 current LCU per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1994 | 1.18 million current LCU per square kilometre | +28.0% |
| 1995 | 1.24 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1996 | 687,660 current LCU per square kilometre | -44.4% |
| 1997 | 1.48 million current LCU per square kilometre | +115.8% |
| 1998 | 1.13 million current LCU per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 1999 | 94,288 current LCU per square kilometre | -91.7% |
| 2000 | 2.01 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2030.8% |
| 2001 | 1.58 million current LCU per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 2002 | 1.60 million current LCU per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2003 | 2.51 million current LCU per square kilometre | +56.7% |
| 2004 | 3.06 million current LCU per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 2005 | 3.86 million current LCU per square kilometre | +26.2% |
| 2006 | 4.26 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2007 | 4.57 million current LCU per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 2008 | 6.15 million current LCU per square kilometre | +34.6% |
| 2009 | 7.27 million current LCU per square kilometre | +18.3% |
| 2010 | 8.99 million current LCU per square kilometre | +23.7% |
| 2011 | 11.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | +28.1% |
| 2012 | 12.75 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2013 | 14.88 million current LCU per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 2014 | 16.97 million current LCU per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 2015 | 15.77 million current LCU per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 2016 | 19.10 million current LCU per square kilometre | +21.1% |
| 2017 | 19.55 million current LCU per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2018 | 21.60 million current LCU per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 2019 | 24.19 million current LCU per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 2020 | 26.99 million current LCU per square kilometre | +11.6% |
| 2021 | 31.08 million current LCU per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 2022 | 32.78 million current LCU per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2023 | 39.89 million current LCU per square kilometre | +21.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28,732 current LCU per square kilometre | 13,629 current LCU per square kilometre | 45,678 current LCU per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 132,184 current LCU per square kilometre | 55,962 current LCU per square kilometre | 307,153 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 434,672 current LCU per square kilometre | 175,942 current LCU per square kilometre | 840,654 current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 915,827 current LCU per square kilometre | 94,288 current LCU per square kilometre | 1.48 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.69 million current LCU per square kilometre | 1.58 million current LCU per square kilometre | 7.27 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 16.53 million current LCU per square kilometre | 8.99 million current LCU per square kilometre | 24.19 million current LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 32.68 million current LCU per square kilometre | 26.99 million current LCU per square kilometre | 39.89 million current LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Burundi
- 18 Jamaica 47.60 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 19 Mauritius 42.37 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 20 Tanzania, United Republic of 41.63 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 22 Chile 38.52 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 23 Armenia 36.11 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
- 24 Rwanda 35.19 million current LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Burundi
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 2.45 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 5.01 Percent per annum (2029)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), annual 20.56 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 1,830 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU), per 427,789 current LCU per person (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) 1.73 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) 0.3341 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$) 78.13 constant 2015 US$ per person (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) 1.73 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per 157.71 constant LCU per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Burundi?
- Taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre in Burundi was 39.89 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Burundi?
- The highest recorded value was 39.89 million current LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Burundi?
- The lowest recorded value was 13,629 current LCU per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Burundi rank for taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Burundi ranks 21st out of 195 countries with data for 2023.
- Is taxes less subsidies on products (current lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Burundi?
- Over the last ten years it is up 168.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Burundi data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Taxes less subsidies on products Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.