NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade in Lithuania

Lithuania: NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade was 96.97 Index in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
96.97 Index
Change on year
up 1.5%
World rank
8th
of 9 countries
All-time high
100 Index
in 2020
All-time low
74.24 Index
in 1995
Years of data
31
1995–2025

NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade in Lithuania, 1995–2025

0204060801001995201020251995: 74.2 Index1996: 80.4 Index1997: 83.7 Index1998: 81.3 Index1999: 84.5 Index2000: 89 Index2001: 88.7 Index2002: 88.9 Index2003: 88.9 Index2004: 96.6 Index2005: 97.6 Index2006: 94.8 Index2007: 95.6 Index2008: 99.1 Index2009: 95.2 Index2010: 95.8 Index2011: 95 Index2012: 94.2 Index2013: 93.9 Index2014: 94.7 Index2015: 97.2 Index2016: 98.8 Index2017: 98.8 Index2018: 97.3 Index2019: 98.2 Index2020: 100 Index2021: 94.7 Index2022: 88.3 Index2023: 93.4 Index2024: 95.6 Index2025: 97 Index

Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Index.

Analysis

The most recent figure for naag chapter 3: expenditure — terms of trade in Lithuania is 96.97 Index, measured in 2025.

The figure is up 1.5% on the previous year and down 0.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, naag chapter 3: expenditure — terms of trade in Lithuania peaked at 100 Index in 2020 and was at its lowest, 74.24 Index, in 1995.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 31 years of available data.

NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade in Lithuania, year by year

Annual values for NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade in Lithuania, 1995 to 2025.
Year Index Change
1995 74.24 Index
1996 80.42 Index +8.3%
1997 83.66 Index +4.0%
1998 81.31 Index -2.8%
1999 84.53 Index +4.0%
2000 89 Index +5.3%
2001 88.66 Index -0.4%
2002 88.94 Index +0.3%
2003 88.94 Index -0.0%
2004 96.56 Index +8.6%
2005 97.59 Index +1.1%
2006 94.79 Index -2.9%
2007 95.65 Index +0.9%
2008 99.1 Index +3.6%
2009 95.17 Index -4.0%
2010 95.77 Index +0.6%
2011 94.98 Index -0.8%
2012 94.17 Index -0.9%
2013 93.9 Index -0.3%
2014 94.7 Index +0.8%
2015 97.15 Index +2.6%
2016 98.78 Index +1.7%
2017 98.79 Index +0.0%
2018 97.33 Index -1.5%
2019 98.23 Index +0.9%
2020 100 Index +1.8%
2021 94.71 Index -5.3%
2022 88.32 Index -6.7%
2023 93.4 Index +5.7%
2024 95.56 Index +2.3%
2025 96.97 Index +1.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 80.83 Index 74.24 Index 84.53 Index 5
2000s 93.44 Index 88.66 Index 99.1 Index 10
2010s 96.38 Index 93.9 Index 98.79 Index 10
2020s 94.83 Index 88.32 Index 100 Index 6

Countries ranked near Lithuania

  1. 5 Canada 108.47 Index compare
  2. 5 Netherlands 99.83 Index compare
  3. 6 Greece 107.8 Index compare
  4. 7 United States of America 107.3 Index compare
  5. 8 Iceland 106.27 Index compare
  6. 9 Portugal 105.83 Index compare
  7. 9 Poland 96.23 Index compare
  8. 10 Luxembourg 102.19 Index compare
  9. 11 Spain 101.64 Index compare

See the full ranking of 44 places →

More economy & growth data for Lithuania

All data for Lithuania →

Frequently asked questions

What is naag chapter 3: expenditure — terms of trade in Lithuania?
Naag chapter 3: expenditure — terms of trade in Lithuania was 96.97 Index in 2025, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
What is the highest naag chapter 3: expenditure — terms of trade recorded in Lithuania?
The highest recorded value was 100 Index in 2020.
What is the lowest naag chapter 3: expenditure — terms of trade recorded in Lithuania?
The lowest recorded value was 74.24 Index in 1995.
How does Lithuania rank for naag chapter 3: expenditure — terms of trade?
Lithuania ranks 8th out of 9 countries with data for 2025.
Is naag chapter 3: expenditure — terms of trade rising or falling in Lithuania?
Over the last ten years it is down 0.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Lithuania data come from?
The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade in Lithuania. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/naag-chapter-3-expenditure-terms-of-trade/lithuania-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/naag-chapter-3-expenditure-terms-of-trade/lithuania-2/">NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade in Lithuania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade
Unit
Index
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 2,137 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

The National Accounts at a Glance (NAAG) is based on the original publication and has nine chapters: The first chapter focuses on indicators of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The second is about income and related indicators and presents measures of net national income, savings and net lending/net borrowing. The third chapter looks at the expenditure approach to GDP, with information on the key components of demand and imports. The fourth chapter presents indicators from a production perspective. The fifth chapter looks at household sector indicators such as household disposable income, saving and net worth. The sixth chapter focuses on general government, presenting indicators such as general government revenue, expenditure and gross debt. The seventh chapter looks at financial and non-financial corporations. The eighth chapter presents indicators of capital stock and depreciation. Finally, chapter 9 provides reference indicators, important in their own right but also because they are used in the construction of many of the indicators presented elsewhere in NAAG.