Lithuania vs United States of America: NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade

Lithuania
96.97 Index
in 2025
United States of America
107.3 Index
in 2024
Lithuania rank
8th
United States of America rank
7th

NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade over time

  • Lithuania
  • United States of America
050100150197019972025

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 107.3 Index against 96.97 Index in Lithuania, a difference of 10.33 Index.

That makes United States of America's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was United States of America ahead.

Lithuania ranks 8th and United States of America ranks 7th of 9 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and United States of America in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s 80.83 Index 96.66 Index 15.83 Index United States of America
2000s 93.44 Index 94.49 Index 1.05 Index United States of America
2010s 96.38 Index 95.48 Index 0.9032 Index Lithuania
2020s 94.4 Index 104.99 Index 10.6 Index United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher naag chapter 3: expenditure — terms of trade, Lithuania or United States of America?
United States of America, at 107.3 Index against 96.97 Index in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in naag chapter 3: expenditure — terms of trade between Lithuania and United States of America?
10.33 Index, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and United States of America?
30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Lithuania and United States of America rank globally for naag chapter 3: expenditure — terms of trade?
Lithuania ranks 8th and United States of America ranks 7th of 9 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs United States of America: NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/naag-chapter-3-expenditure-terms-of-trade/lithuania-2/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/naag-chapter-3-expenditure-terms-of-trade/lithuania-2/united-states/">Lithuania vs United States of America: NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
NAAG Chapter 3: Expenditure — Terms of trade
Unit
Index
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
44 places, 2,137 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

The National Accounts at a Glance (NAAG) is based on the original publication and has nine chapters: The first chapter focuses on indicators of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The second is about income and related indicators and presents measures of net national income, savings and net lending/net borrowing. The third chapter looks at the expenditure approach to GDP, with information on the key components of demand and imports. The fourth chapter presents indicators from a production perspective. The fifth chapter looks at household sector indicators such as household disposable income, saving and net worth. The sixth chapter focuses on general government, presenting indicators such as general government revenue, expenditure and gross debt. The seventh chapter looks at financial and non-financial corporations. The eighth chapter presents indicators of capital stock and depreciation. Finally, chapter 9 provides reference indicators, important in their own right but also because they are used in the construction of many of the indicators presented elsewhere in NAAG.