Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Ecuador

Ecuador: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
down 4.4%
World rank
143rd
of 166 countries
All-time high
98,627 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2017
All-time low
12,352 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2000
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Ecuador, 1961–2023

20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.

Analysis

The most recent figure for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Ecuador is 88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.4% on the previous year and down 0.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Ecuador peaked at 98,627 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2017 and was at its lowest, 12,352 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 2000.

Ecuador ranks 143rd of 166 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Ecuador, 1961 to 2023.
Year constant LCU per square kilometre Change
1961 17,619 constant LCU per square kilometre
1962 16,862 constant LCU per square kilometre -4.3%
1963 17,386 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.1%
1964 18,508 constant LCU per square kilometre +6.5%
1965 18,950 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.4%
1966 18,522 constant LCU per square kilometre -2.3%
1967 21,187 constant LCU per square kilometre +14.4%
1968 21,359 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.8%
1969 22,111 constant LCU per square kilometre +3.5%
1970 23,005 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.0%
1971 27,124 constant LCU per square kilometre +17.9%
1972 26,191 constant LCU per square kilometre -3.4%
1973 25,059 constant LCU per square kilometre -4.3%
1974 24,047 constant LCU per square kilometre -4.0%
1975 32,367 constant LCU per square kilometre +34.6%
1976 33,821 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.5%
1977 36,908 constant LCU per square kilometre +9.1%
1978 40,323 constant LCU per square kilometre +9.3%
1979 38,940 constant LCU per square kilometre -3.4%
1980 39,861 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.4%
1981 39,321 constant LCU per square kilometre -1.4%
1982 39,331 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.0%
1983 33,287 constant LCU per square kilometre -15.4%
1984 33,451 constant LCU per square kilometre +0.5%
1985 36,075 constant LCU per square kilometre +7.8%
1986 37,919 constant LCU per square kilometre +5.1%
1987 40,050 constant LCU per square kilometre +5.6%
1988 36,459 constant LCU per square kilometre -9.0%
1989 37,055 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.6%
1990 36,387 constant LCU per square kilometre -1.8%
1991 36,829 constant LCU per square kilometre +1.2%
1992 38,626 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.9%
1993 35,212 constant LCU per square kilometre -8.8%
1994 37,939 constant LCU per square kilometre +7.7%
1995 36,926 constant LCU per square kilometre -2.7%
1996 35,160 constant LCU per square kilometre -4.8%
1997 39,117 constant LCU per square kilometre +11.3%
1998 48,362 constant LCU per square kilometre +23.6%
1999 33,785 constant LCU per square kilometre -30.1%
2000 12,352 constant LCU per square kilometre -63.4%
2001 26,725 constant LCU per square kilometre +116.4%
2002 31,935 constant LCU per square kilometre +19.5%
2003 27,398 constant LCU per square kilometre -14.2%
2004 36,649 constant LCU per square kilometre +33.8%
2005 44,391 constant LCU per square kilometre +21.1%
2006 48,098 constant LCU per square kilometre +8.4%
2007 50,080 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.1%
2008 62,350 constant LCU per square kilometre +24.5%
2009 57,818 constant LCU per square kilometre -7.3%
2010 64,880 constant LCU per square kilometre +12.2%
2011 73,008 constant LCU per square kilometre +12.5%
2012 74,951 constant LCU per square kilometre +2.7%
2013 88,100 constant LCU per square kilometre +17.5%
2014 92,378 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.9%
2015 80,422 constant LCU per square kilometre -12.9%
2016 85,612 constant LCU per square kilometre +6.5%
2017 98,627 constant LCU per square kilometre +15.2%
2018 97,545 constant LCU per square kilometre -1.1%
2019 90,461 constant LCU per square kilometre -7.3%
2020 67,167 constant LCU per square kilometre -25.8%
2021 83,223 constant LCU per square kilometre +23.9%
2022 92,078 constant LCU per square kilometre +10.6%
2023 88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre -4.4%

Ecuador compared with similar countries

  • Ecuador's 88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre, 5% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
  • Ecuador's 88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 412,013 constant LCU per square kilometre, 21% of the median. (23 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2001 +116.4% 12,352 constant LCU per square kilometre 26,725 constant LCU per square kilometre
2000 -63.4% 33,785 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,352 constant LCU per square kilometre

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 19,167 constant LCU per square kilometre 16,862 constant LCU per square kilometre 22,111 constant LCU per square kilometre 9
1970s 30,779 constant LCU per square kilometre 23,005 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,323 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1980s 37,281 constant LCU per square kilometre 33,287 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,050 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1990s 37,834 constant LCU per square kilometre 33,785 constant LCU per square kilometre 48,362 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2000s 39,780 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,352 constant LCU per square kilometre 62,350 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2010s 84,599 constant LCU per square kilometre 64,880 constant LCU per square kilometre 98,627 constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2020s 82,634 constant LCU per square kilometre 67,167 constant LCU per square kilometre 92,078 constant LCU per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 140 Montenegro 101,726 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  2. 141 Botswana 99,977 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  3. 142 Peru 95,120 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  4. 144 Solomon Islands 82,170 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  5. 145 Brazil 80,216 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  6. 146 Azerbaijan 77,937 constant LCU per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 166 places →

More economy & growth data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Ecuador?
Gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Ecuador was 88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 98,627 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2017.
What is the lowest gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 12,352 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2000.
How does Ecuador rank for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 143rd out of 166 countries with data for 2023.
Is gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is down 0.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/">Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.