Ecuador vs Peru: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru
95,120 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
143rd
Peru rank
142nd

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Peru
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Peru currently reports 95,120 constant LCU per square kilometre against 88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 7,050 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 143rd and Peru ranks 142nd of 166 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 4 and Peru in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Peru Difference Ahead
1960s 19,167 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,528 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,639 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 30,779 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,589 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,190 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 37,281 constant LCU per square kilometre 22,697 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,584 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 37,834 constant LCU per square kilometre 26,606 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,228 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 39,780 constant LCU per square kilometre 40,415 constant LCU per square kilometre 635.55 constant LCU per square kilometre Peru
2010s 84,599 constant LCU per square kilometre 95,371 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,772 constant LCU per square kilometre Peru
2020s 82,634 constant LCU per square kilometre 94,643 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,008 constant LCU per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Peru?
Peru, at 95,120 constant LCU per square kilometre against 88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Peru?
7,050 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 143rd and Peru ranks 142nd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Peru: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/peru/">Ecuador vs Peru: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.