Ecuador vs Montenegro: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro
101,726 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
143rd
Montenegro rank
140th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Montenegro
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 101,726 constant LCU per square kilometre against 88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 13,656 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 143rd and Montenegro ranks 140th of 166 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 54,587 constant LCU per square kilometre 66,028 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,442 constant LCU per square kilometre Montenegro
2010s 84,599 constant LCU per square kilometre 67,022 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,577 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 82,634 constant LCU per square kilometre 92,131 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,497 constant LCU per square kilometre Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 101,726 constant LCU per square kilometre against 88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Montenegro?
13,656 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Montenegro?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Montenegro rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 143rd and Montenegro ranks 140th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Montenegro: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/montenegro/">Ecuador vs Montenegro: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.