Botswana vs Ecuador: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Botswana
99,977 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
141st
Ecuador rank
143rd

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Ecuador
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 99,977 constant LCU per square kilometre against 88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 11,907 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Ecuador ahead.

Botswana ranks 141st and Ecuador ranks 143rd of 166 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 1,929 constant LCU per square kilometre 36,472 constant LCU per square kilometre 34,543 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 3,334 constant LCU per square kilometre 37,281 constant LCU per square kilometre 33,947 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 7,770 constant LCU per square kilometre 37,834 constant LCU per square kilometre 30,065 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 22,509 constant LCU per square kilometre 39,780 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,271 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 70,068 constant LCU per square kilometre 84,599 constant LCU per square kilometre 14,530 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 92,685 constant LCU per square kilometre 82,634 constant LCU per square kilometre 10,050 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Botswana or Ecuador?
Botswana, at 99,977 constant LCU per square kilometre against 88,070 constant LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Botswana and Ecuador?
11,907 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ecuador?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Ecuador rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 141st and Ecuador ranks 143rd of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Ecuador: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/">Botswana vs Ecuador: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.