Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Congo

Congo: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 8.5%
World rank
65th
of 166 countries
All-time high
10.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2015
All-time low
594,073 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1964
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Congo, 1961–2023

02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.

Analysis

Congo recorded 3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in 2023.

The figure is up 8.5% on the previous year and down 47.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Congo peaked at 10.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2015 and was at its lowest, 594,073 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1964.

Congo ranks 65th of 166 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Congo, year by year

Annual values for Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Congo, 1961 to 2023.
Year constant LCU per square kilometre Change
1961 1.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre
1962 1.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre -40.1%
1963 658,492 constant LCU per square kilometre -35.2%
1964 594,073 constant LCU per square kilometre -9.8%
1965 658,492 constant LCU per square kilometre +10.8%
1966 1.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre +52.7%
1967 1.40 million constant LCU per square kilometre +38.9%
1968 1.31 million constant LCU per square kilometre -6.0%
1969 1.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre -6.1%
1970 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre -6.1%
1971 1.36 million constant LCU per square kilometre +17.2%
1972 1.59 million constant LCU per square kilometre +17.1%
1973 1.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre +17.1%
1974 2.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre +17.0%
1975 2.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre +18.0%
1976 1.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre -23.3%
1977 1.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre -19.5%
1978 1.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre -20.7%
1979 1.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre +7.3%
1980 2.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre +49.1%
1981 3.64 million constant LCU per square kilometre +81.0%
1982 4.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre +36.8%
1983 4.21 million constant LCU per square kilometre -15.5%
1984 3.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre -11.1%
1985 3.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre -5.0%
1986 2.29 million constant LCU per square kilometre -35.5%
1987 1.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre -31.1%
1988 1.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre -14.7%
1989 1.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre -18.6%
1990 1.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre +14.7%
1991 1.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre +25.6%
1992 1.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre +0.2%
1993 2.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre +32.1%
1994 3.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre +75.2%
1995 2.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre -31.4%
1996 2.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre -3.3%
1997 1.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre -36.7%
1998 1.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre -0.4%
1999 1.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre +22.4%
2000 2.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre +19.0%
2001 2.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre -1.3%
2002 2.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.2%
2003 2.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre +13.5%
2004 2.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre +0.5%
2005 2.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre +4.7%
2006 2.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre +7.6%
2007 5.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre +81.1%
2008 4.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre -9.8%
2009 4.87 million constant LCU per square kilometre +4.0%
2010 7.84 million constant LCU per square kilometre +60.9%
2011 4.89 million constant LCU per square kilometre -37.6%
2012 6.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre +37.7%
2013 7.37 million constant LCU per square kilometre +9.5%
2014 8.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre +14.3%
2015 10.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre +23.7%
2016 8.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre -18.1%
2017 5.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre -34.9%
2018 4.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre -27.8%
2019 3.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre -9.5%
2020 2.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre -21.1%
2021 3.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre +13.8%
2022 3.58 million constant LCU per square kilometre +9.7%
2023 3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre +8.5%

Congo compared with similar countries

  • Congo's 3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre, 2.1× the median. (43 countries reporting)
  • Congo's 3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 3.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre, 1.2× the median. (43 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 1.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre 594,073 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre 9
1970s 1.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.57 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1980s 2.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1990s 2.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.26 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2000s 3.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre 5.19 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2010s 6.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.63 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2020s 3.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.86 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Congo

  1. 62 Luxembourg 4.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  2. 63 Belgium 4.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  3. 64 San Marino 3.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  4. 66 Sweden 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  5. 67 Kenya 3.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  6. 68 Mexico 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 166 places →

More economy & growth data for Congo

All data for Congo →

Frequently asked questions

What is gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Congo?
Gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Congo was 3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Congo?
The highest recorded value was 10.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2015.
What is the lowest gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Congo?
The lowest recorded value was 594,073 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1964.
How does Congo rank for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 65th out of 166 countries with data for 2023.
Is gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Congo?
Over the last ten years it is down 47.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Congo data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Congo. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/">Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Congo</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.