Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Mexico

Mexico: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre was 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 13.0%
World rank
68th
of 166 countries
All-time high
3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
328,453 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Mexico, 1961–2023

01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2023, gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Mexico stood at 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 13.0% on the previous year and up 12.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Mexico peaked at 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 328,453 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 1962.

Mexico ranks 68th of 166 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Mexico, year by year

Annual values for Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Mexico, 1961 to 2023.
Year constant LCU per square kilometre Change
1961 329,832 constant LCU per square kilometre
1962 328,453 constant LCU per square kilometre -0.4%
1963 384,831 constant LCU per square kilometre +17.2%
1964 459,935 constant LCU per square kilometre +19.5%
1965 654,204 constant LCU per square kilometre +42.2%
1966 706,428 constant LCU per square kilometre +8.0%
1967 735,909 constant LCU per square kilometre +4.2%
1968 853,648 constant LCU per square kilometre +16.0%
1969 786,399 constant LCU per square kilometre -7.9%
1970 833,000 constant LCU per square kilometre +5.9%
1971 806,435 constant LCU per square kilometre -3.2%
1972 898,773 constant LCU per square kilometre +11.5%
1973 1.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre +14.3%
1974 1.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre +17.2%
1975 1.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre +2.3%
1976 1.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre +0.3%
1977 1.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre -5.7%
1978 1.33 million constant LCU per square kilometre +14.0%
1979 1.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre +15.6%
1980 1.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre +12.7%
1981 1.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre +15.2%
1982 1.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre -24.5%
1983 1.09 million constant LCU per square kilometre -27.4%
1984 1.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre +5.4%
1985 1.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre +11.1%
1986 1.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre -18.9%
1987 1.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre +5.5%
1988 1.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre +12.0%
1989 1.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre +4.4%
1990 1.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre +11.1%
1991 1.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre +7.5%
1992 1.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre +14.1%
1993 1.70 million constant LCU per square kilometre -2.6%
1994 2.02 million constant LCU per square kilometre +18.5%
1995 1.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre -29.3%
1996 1.61 million constant LCU per square kilometre +12.6%
1997 1.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre +12.7%
1998 1.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre +7.3%
1999 2.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre +5.3%
2000 2.11 million constant LCU per square kilometre +3.0%
2001 1.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre -9.1%
2002 1.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.0%
2003 1.98 million constant LCU per square kilometre +2.1%
2004 2.15 million constant LCU per square kilometre +8.6%
2005 2.18 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.4%
2006 2.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre +9.4%
2007 2.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre +6.7%
2008 2.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre +5.6%
2009 2.38 million constant LCU per square kilometre -11.4%
2010 2.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre +7.0%
2011 2.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre +9.1%
2012 2.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre +2.5%
2013 2.75 million constant LCU per square kilometre -3.8%
2014 2.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.9%
2015 2.91 million constant LCU per square kilometre +4.1%
2016 2.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre +1.0%
2017 2.93 million constant LCU per square kilometre -0.2%
2018 2.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre -0.5%
2019 2.80 million constant LCU per square kilometre -4.2%
2020 2.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre -18.3%
2021 2.54 million constant LCU per square kilometre +11.4%
2022 2.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre +7.3%
2023 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre +13.0%

Mexico compared with similar countries

  • Mexico's 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1.62 million constant LCU per square kilometre, 1.9× the median. (46 countries reporting)
  • Mexico's 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 412,013 constant LCU per square kilometre, 7.5× the median. (23 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 582,182 constant LCU per square kilometre 328,453 constant LCU per square kilometre 853,648 constant LCU per square kilometre 9
1970s 1.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre 806,435 constant LCU per square kilometre 1.53 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1980s 1.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.04 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.99 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
1990s 1.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.43 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.05 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2000s 2.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2010s 2.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.55 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.94 million constant LCU per square kilometre 10
2020s 2.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.28 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Mexico

  1. 65 Congo 3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  2. 66 Sweden 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  3. 67 Kenya 3.10 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  4. 69 Norway 2.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  5. 70 Vanuatu 2.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare
  6. 71 Mali 2.78 million constant LCU per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 166 places →

More economy & growth data for Mexico

All data for Mexico →

Frequently asked questions

What is gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Mexico?
Gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre in Mexico was 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Mexico?
The highest recorded value was 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023.
What is the lowest gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre recorded in Mexico?
The lowest recorded value was 328,453 constant LCU per square kilometre in 1962.
How does Mexico rank for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Mexico ranks 68th out of 166 countries with data for 2023.
Is gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre rising or falling in Mexico?
Over the last ten years it is up 12.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Mexico data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Mexico. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/mexico/">Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre in Mexico</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.