Congo vs Mexico: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Congo
3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
65th
Mexico rank
68th

Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Mexico
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 794,580 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 65th and Mexico ranks 68th of 166 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 1.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre 582,182 constant LCU per square kilometre 481,420 constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
1970s 1.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre 560,118 constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
1980s 2.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.34 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.51 million constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
1990s 2.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.73 million constant LCU per square kilometre 280,054 constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
2000s 3.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre 972,744 constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
2010s 6.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.92 million constant LCU per square kilometre Congo
2020s 3.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre 2.66 million constant LCU per square kilometre 735,198 constant LCU per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Congo or Mexico?
Congo, at 3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.08 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Congo and Mexico?
794,580 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Mexico rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 65th and Mexico ranks 68th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mexico: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mexico/">Congo vs Mexico: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,614 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.