Congo vs Sweden: Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Congo
3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
65th
Sweden rank
66th
Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time
- Congo
- Sweden
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 645,270 constant LCU per square kilometre.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sweden ahead.
Congo ranks 65th and Sweden ranks 66th of 166 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.69 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.25 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 432,954 constant LCU per square kilometre | Congo |
| 1980s | 2.85 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.35 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.49 million constant LCU per square kilometre | Congo |
| 1990s | 2.01 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.52 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 487,350 constant LCU per square kilometre | Congo |
| 2000s | 3.20 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 1.14 million constant LCU per square kilometre | Congo |
| 2010s | 6.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 2.68 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 4.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre | Congo |
| 2020s | 3.39 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre | 167,145 constant LCU per square kilometre | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Congo or Sweden?
- Congo, at 3.88 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 3.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Congo and Sweden?
- 645,270 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sweden?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Sweden rank globally for gross capital formation (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
- Congo ranks 65th and Sweden ranks 66th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross capital formation (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.