Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore
Singapore: Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. was 150.81 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore, 1991–2025
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Analysis
Singapore recorded 150.81 for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in 2025. That is the highest value across all 35 years on record.
The figure is up 8.1% on the previous year and up 53.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore peaked at 150.81 in 2025 and was at its lowest, 69.9, in 2001.
Singapore ranks 15th of 54 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 35 years of available data.
Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 99.41 | — |
| 1992 | 101.84 | +2.4% |
| 1993 | 101.84 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 101.84 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 101.84 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 101.84 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 95.25 | -6.5% |
| 1998 | 74.82 | -21.4% |
| 1999 | 75.7 | +1.2% |
| 2000 | 73.15 | -3.4% |
| 2001 | 69.9 | -4.4% |
| 2002 | 74.94 | +7.2% |
| 2003 | 74.31 | -0.8% |
| 2004 | 79.69 | +7.2% |
| 2005 | 81.73 | +2.6% |
| 2006 | 83.01 | +1.6% |
| 2007 | 88.73 | +6.9% |
| 2008 | 97.45 | +9.8% |
| 2009 | 92.4 | -5.2% |
| 2010 | 99.42 | +7.6% |
| 2011 | 106.89 | +7.5% |
| 2012 | 104.32 | -2.4% |
| 2013 | 107.1 | +2.7% |
| 2014 | 105.24 | -1.7% |
| 2015 | 98.15 | -6.7% |
| 2016 | 96.61 | -1.6% |
| 2017 | 97.8 | +1.2% |
| 2018 | 101.63 | +3.9% |
| 2019 | 99.48 | -2.1% |
| 2020 | 100.47 | +1.0% |
| 2021 | 107.05 | +6.5% |
| 2022 | 147.04 | +37.4% |
| 2023 | 147.61 | +0.4% |
| 2024 | 139.55 | -5.5% |
| 2025 | 150.81 | +8.1% |
Singapore compared with similar countries
- Singapore's 150.81 is above the median for high income countries, which is 125.19, 1.2× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Singapore's 150.81 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 125.47, 1.2× the median. (8 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +37.4% | 107.05 | 147.04 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 94.93 | 74.82 | 101.84 | 9 |
| 2000s | 81.53 | 69.9 | 97.45 | 10 |
| 2010s | 101.66 | 96.61 | 107.1 | 10 |
| 2020s | 132.09 | 100.47 | 150.81 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Singapore
More economy & growth data for Singapore
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.99 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 2.5 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 94.20 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.156 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 15,415 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 159.09 billion BoP, current US$ (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual 17.78 % change on previous year (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.2634 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 26,032 BoP, current US$ per person (2025)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 12.55 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore?
- Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. in Singapore was 150.81 in 2025, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Singapore?
- The highest recorded value was 150.81 in 2025.
- What is the lowest edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. recorded in Singapore?
- The lowest recorded value was 69.9 in 2001.
- How does Singapore rank for edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c.?
- Singapore ranks 15th out of 54 countries with data for 2025.
- Is edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c. rising or falling in Singapore?
- Over the last ten years it is up 53.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Singapore data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Edible roots and tubers with high starch or inulin content, n.e.c., fresh — Producer Price Index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
This sub-domain contains data on agriculture producer prices and the producer price index. Agriculture producer prices are prices received by farmers for primary crops, live animals and livestock primary products as collected at the point of initial sale (prices paid at the farm gate). Annual data are provided from 1991 (while mothly data start in January 2010) for 180 countries and 212 products. The producer price index is the index of agricultural producer prices that measures the average annual change over time in the selling prices received by farmers (prices at the farm gate or at the first point of sale). The three categories of producer price index available in FAOSTAT comprise: single-item price index, commodity group index and the agriculture producer price index.