Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per was 20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre
Change on year
up 6.3%
World rank
166th
of 194 countries
All-time high
26,509 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2001
All-time low
8,023 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2008
Years of data
55
1969–2023
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Zimbabwe, 1969–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in constant LCU per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Zimbabwe stood at 20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre.
The figure is up 6.3% on the previous year and up 90.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Zimbabwe peaked at 26,509 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2001 and was at its lowest, 8,023 constant LCU per square kilometre, in 2008.
That places Zimbabwe 166th out of 194 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 55 years of available data.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | constant LCU per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1969 | 10,261 constant LCU per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 9,490 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 1971 | 12,042 constant LCU per square kilometre | +26.9% |
| 1972 | 13,610 constant LCU per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1973 | 11,005 constant LCU per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 1974 | 12,999 constant LCU per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1975 | 12,228 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 1976 | 13,610 constant LCU per square kilometre | +11.3% |
| 1977 | 10,713 constant LCU per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 1978 | 11,802 constant LCU per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 1979 | 11,802 constant LCU per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 11,989 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1981 | 13,690 constant LCU per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1982 | 12,706 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 1983 | 10,713 constant LCU per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 1984 | 13,185 constant LCU per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 1985 | 16,322 constant LCU per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 1986 | 14,980 constant LCU per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 1987 | 14,339 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1988 | 14,797 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1989 | 15,308 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 1990 | 17,166 constant LCU per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1991 | 17,344 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1992 | 13,321 constant LCU per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 1993 | 16,934 constant LCU per square kilometre | +27.1% |
| 1994 | 18,173 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1995 | 16,794 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 1996 | 20,122 constant LCU per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 1997 | 20,768 constant LCU per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1998 | 21,824 constant LCU per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1999 | 22,798 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2000 | 23,254 constant LCU per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2001 | 26,509 constant LCU per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 2002 | 20,147 constant LCU per square kilometre | -24.0% |
| 2003 | 17,125 constant LCU per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 2004 | 15,584 constant LCU per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 2005 | 14,804 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 2006 | 14,212 constant LCU per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 2007 | 13,218 constant LCU per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 2008 | 8,023 constant LCU per square kilometre | -39.3% |
| 2009 | 9,210 constant LCU per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 2010 | 9,876 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2011 | 10,014 constant LCU per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2012 | 10,799 constant LCU per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2013 | 10,522 constant LCU per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2014 | 12,941 constant LCU per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 2015 | 12,268 constant LCU per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 2016 | 11,792 constant LCU per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2017 | 13,706 constant LCU per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 2018 | 16,228 constant LCU per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 2019 | 14,540 constant LCU per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2020 | 15,143 constant LCU per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2021 | 17,790 constant LCU per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2022 | 18,884 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2023 | 20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre | +6.3% |
Zimbabwe compared with similar countries
- Zimbabwe's 20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 897,981 constant LCU per square kilometre, 2% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Zimbabwe's 20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 2.23 million constant LCU per square kilometre, 1% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,261 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10,261 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10,261 constant LCU per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1970s | 11,930 constant LCU per square kilometre | 9,490 constant LCU per square kilometre | 13,610 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 13,803 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10,713 constant LCU per square kilometre | 16,322 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 18,524 constant LCU per square kilometre | 13,321 constant LCU per square kilometre | 22,798 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 16,209 constant LCU per square kilometre | 8,023 constant LCU per square kilometre | 26,509 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 12,269 constant LCU per square kilometre | 9,876 constant LCU per square kilometre | 16,228 constant LCU per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 17,973 constant LCU per square kilometre | 15,143 constant LCU per square kilometre | 20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 163 Papua New Guinea 24,602 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 164 Jordan 22,242 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 165 East Timor 22,128 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 167 Bulgaria 20,002 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 168 Belize 18,875 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
- 169 Palau 18,042 constant LCU per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Zimbabwe
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.02 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 3 Percent per annum (2029)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), gaps 131.30 million BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0032 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 7.89 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), gaps filled 465.43 million BoP, current US$ (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), annual -22.97 % change on previous year (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per unit 0.0112 BoP, current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$), per capita 27.98 BoP, current US$ per person (2024)
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$), annual growth rate 319.78 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Zimbabwe?
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per in Zimbabwe was 20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 26,509 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2001.
- What is the lowest agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 8,023 constant LCU per square kilometre in 2008.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
- Zimbabwe ranks 166th out of 194 countries with data for 2023.
- Is agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 90.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.