Palau vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Palau
18,042 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Palau rank
169th
Zimbabwe rank
166th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Palau
  • Zimbabwe
10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k196919962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre against 18,042 constant LCU per square kilometre in Palau, a difference of 2,032 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Palau's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Palau ranks 169th and Zimbabwe ranks 166th of 194 countries.

Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Palau Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 23,923 constant LCU per square kilometre 16,209 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,714 constant LCU per square kilometre Palau
2010s 21,411 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,269 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,142 constant LCU per square kilometre Palau
2020s 18,161 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,973 constant LCU per square kilometre 188.25 constant LCU per square kilometre Palau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Palau or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre against 18,042 constant LCU per square kilometre in Palau as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Palau and Zimbabwe?
2,032 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Palau and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Palau ranks 169th and Zimbabwe ranks 166th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Palau vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/palau/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/palau/zimbabwe/">Palau vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.