East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

East Timor
22,128 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor rank
165th
Zimbabwe rank
166th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • East Timor
  • Zimbabwe
10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196919962023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 22,128 constant LCU per square kilometre against 20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2,054 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

East Timor ranks 165th and Zimbabwe ranks 166th of 194 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Timor Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 17,933 constant LCU per square kilometre 16,209 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,724 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 19,493 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,269 constant LCU per square kilometre 7,224 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 20,850 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,973 constant LCU per square kilometre 2,877 constant LCU per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, East Timor or Zimbabwe?
East Timor, at 22,128 constant LCU per square kilometre against 20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between East Timor and Zimbabwe?
2,054 constant LCU per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do East Timor and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
East Timor ranks 165th and Zimbabwe ranks 166th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/">East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.