Belize vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per

Belize
18,875 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Belize rank
168th
Zimbabwe rank
166th

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per over time

  • Belize
  • Zimbabwe
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196919962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre against 18,875 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belize, a difference of 1,199 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Belize ranks 168th and Zimbabwe ranks 166th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 3,753 constant LCU per square kilometre 11,930 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,177 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 5,173 constant LCU per square kilometre 13,803 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,630 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 8,665 constant LCU per square kilometre 18,524 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,859 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 15,620 constant LCU per square kilometre 16,209 constant LCU per square kilometre 588.94 constant LCU per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 17,425 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,269 constant LCU per square kilometre 5,156 constant LCU per square kilometre Belize
2020s 19,008 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,973 constant LCU per square kilometre 1,035 constant LCU per square kilometre Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per, Belize or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 20,074 constant LCU per square kilometre against 18,875 constant LCU per square kilometre in Belize as of 2023.
What is the difference in agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per between Belize and Zimbabwe?
1,199 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Belize and Zimbabwe rank globally for agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant lcu), per?
Belize ranks 168th and Zimbabwe ranks 166th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belize/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-added-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/belize/zimbabwe/">Belize vs Zimbabwe: Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
195 places, 7,966 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.