Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square in Belarus
Belarus: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square was 595.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ▲ Rising
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per in Belarus, 1992–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2021, adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per in Belarus stood at 595.09 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 10.4% on the previous year and down 28.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per in Belarus peaked at 832.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011 and was at its lowest, 184.95 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2000.
That places Belarus 130th out of 178 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 30 years of available data.
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square in Belarus, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 237.51 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 288.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1994 | 301.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1995 | 319.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1996 | 313.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1997 | 256.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 1998 | 241.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.8% |
| 1999 | 190.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 2000 | 184.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2001 | 189.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2002 | 238.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 2003 | 272.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 2004 | 327.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 2005 | 429.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 2006 | 490.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 2007 | 560.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 2008 | 743.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 2009 | 678.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2010 | 783.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 2011 | 832.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2012 | 743.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 2013 | 831.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 2014 | 827.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2015 | 558.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.6% |
| 2016 | 451.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.1% |
| 2017 | 489.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2018 | 532.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 2019 | 558.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 2020 | 538.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2021 | 595.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 595.09 current US$ per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1,396 current US$ per square kilometre, 43% of the median. (53 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 595.09 current US$ per square kilometre is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1,424 current US$ per square kilometre, 42% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 268.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 190.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 319.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 411.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 184.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 743.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 660.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 451.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 832.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 566.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 538.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 595.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 127 Laos 687.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 128 Afghanistan 666.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 129 Panama 634.25 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 131 Chile 546.24 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 132 Turkmenistan 474.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 133 Colombia 441.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Belarus
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 04 - Annual real GDP 1.52 Percent per annum (2029)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 02 - Annual real GDP 1.07 Percent per annum (2029)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.0151 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, US dollar, per capita 154.85 units per person (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, annual growth rate 0.0156 % change on previous year (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per unit of GDP 0.011 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- SDRs holdings, SDR, per capita 113.07 units per person (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, annual growth rate 5.01 % change on previous year (2025)
- IMF holdings of currency, US dollar, per unit of GDP 0.01 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per in Belarus?
- Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per in Belarus was 595.09 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 832.08 current US$ per square kilometre in 2011.
- What is the lowest adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 184.95 current US$ per square kilometre in 2000.
- How does Belarus rank for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
- Belarus ranks 130th out of 178 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 28.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 30 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage Global Burden of Disease 2013 study, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.