Belarus vs Panama: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Belarus
595.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Panama
634.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Belarus rank
130th
Panama rank
129th

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Belarus
  • Panama
200400600800199020052021

How they compare

Panama currently reports 634.25 current US$ per square kilometre against 595.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 39.16 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Panama ahead.

Belarus ranks 130th and Panama ranks 129th of 178 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 268.52 current US$ per square kilometre 270.39 current US$ per square kilometre 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre Panama
2000s 411.59 current US$ per square kilometre 340.35 current US$ per square kilometre 71.24 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 660.9 current US$ per square kilometre 612.61 current US$ per square kilometre 48.28 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 566.98 current US$ per square kilometre 633.15 current US$ per square kilometre 66.17 current US$ per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Belarus or Panama?
Panama, at 634.25 current US$ per square kilometre against 595.09 current US$ per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Belarus and Panama?
39.16 current US$ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Panama?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do Belarus and Panama rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Belarus ranks 130th and Panama ranks 129th of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Panama: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/panama/">Belarus vs Panama: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.