Belarus vs Turkmenistan: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square

Belarus
595.09 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Turkmenistan
474.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2019
Belarus rank
130th
Turkmenistan rank
132nd

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current) … square over time

  • Belarus
  • Turkmenistan
0200400600800199220062021

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 595.09 current US$ per square kilometre against 474.71 current US$ per square kilometre in Turkmenistan, a difference of 120.38 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Turkmenistan's.

Across all 28 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 130th and Turkmenistan ranks 132nd of 178 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 268.52 current US$ per square kilometre 65.22 current US$ per square kilometre 203.29 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 411.59 current US$ per square kilometre 116.95 current US$ per square kilometre 294.64 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 660.9 current US$ per square kilometre 391.51 current US$ per square kilometre 269.39 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per, Belarus or Turkmenistan?
Belarus, at 595.09 current US$ per square kilometre against 474.71 current US$ per square kilometre in Turkmenistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per between Belarus and Turkmenistan?
120.38 current US$ per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Turkmenistan?
28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Turkmenistan rank globally for adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current us$), per?
Belarus ranks 130th and Turkmenistan ranks 132nd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Turkmenistan: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-particulate-emission-damage-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/turkmenistan/">Belarus vs Turkmenistan: Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 5,405 data points, 1990–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.