Adjusted savings: net forest depletion in Eritrea

Eritrea: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion was 0.0% in 2011. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2011)
0.0%
World rank
112th
of 185 countries
All-time high
8.7%
in 1995
All-time low
0.0%
in 2009
Years of data
19
1993–2011

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion in Eritrea, 1993–2011

024681993200220111993: 5.4 % of GNI1994: 6 % of GNI1995: 8.7 % of GNI1996: 7.7 % of GNI1997: 7.6 % of GNI1998: 7.5 % of GNI1999: 4.8 % of GNI2000: 4.8 % of GNI2001: 4.2 % of GNI2002: 2.6 % of GNI2003: 3.8 % of GNI2004: 2.9 % of GNI2005: 3.2 % of GNI2006: 2.3 % of GNI2007: 2.5 % of GNI2008: 1.6 % of GNI2009: 0 % of GNI2010: 0 % of GNI2011: 0 % of GNI

Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Measured in % of GNI.

Analysis

In 2011, adjusted savings: net forest depletion in Eritrea stood at 0.0%. That is the lowest value across all 19 years on record.

That represents a change of down 100.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adjusted savings: net forest depletion in Eritrea peaked at 8.7% in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2009.

That places Eritrea 112th out of 185 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion in Eritrea, year by year

Annual values for Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI) in Eritrea, 1993 to 2011.
Year % of GNI Change
1993 5.4%
1994 6.0% +11.6%
1995 8.7% +45.3%
1996 7.7% -11.4%
1997 7.6% -2.4%
1998 7.5% -1.1%
1999 4.8% -35.9%
2000 4.8% +1.1%
2001 4.2% -12.6%
2002 2.6% -38.2%
2003 3.8% +45.7%
2004 2.9% -23.9%
2005 3.2% +11.0%
2006 2.3% -27.8%
2007 2.5% +5.7%
2008 1.6% -35.9%
2009 0.0% -100.0%
2010 0.0%
2011 0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 6.8% 4.8% 8.7% 7
2000s 2.8% 0.0% 4.8% 10
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2

Countries ranked near Eritrea

  1. 109 United Arab Emirates 0.0% compare
  2. 110 Iceland 0.0%
  3. 111 Qatar 0.0% compare
  4. 112 Algeria 0.0%
  5. 112 Argentina 0.0%
  6. 112 Azerbaijan 0.0%
  7. 112 Belarus 0.0%
  8. 112 Benin 0.0% compare
  9. 112 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0.0%
  10. 112 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0.0% compare
  11. 112 Brazil 0.0%
  12. 112 Bulgaria 0.0%
  13. 112 Burkina Faso 0.0%
  14. 112 Cambodia 0.0%
  15. 112 Canada 0.0%
  16. 112 Central African Republic 0.0%
  17. 112 Chile 0.0%
  18. 112 China 0.0%
  19. 112 Colombia 0.0%
  20. 112 Costa Rica 0.0% compare
  21. 112 Côte d'Ivoire 0.0%
  22. 112 Cyprus 0.0% compare
  23. 112 Ecuador 0.0% compare
  24. 112 Estonia 0.0%
  25. 112 Finland 0.0%
  26. 112 Germany 0.0%
  27. 112 Guatemala 0.0% compare
  28. 112 Honduras 0.0% compare
  29. 112 Hungary 0.0%
  30. 112 Indonesia 0.0%
  31. 112 Iran, Islamic Republic of 0.0% compare
  32. 112 Ireland 0.0% compare
  33. 112 Israel 0.0% compare
  34. 112 Japan 0.0%
  35. 112 Kazakhstan 0.0%
  36. 112 Republic of Korea 0.0%
  37. 112 Kyrgyzstan 0.0%
  38. 112 Latvia 0.0%
  39. 112 Lebanon 0.0% compare
  40. 112 Lithuania 0.0% compare
  41. 112 Mexico 0.0%
  42. 112 Republic of Moldova 0.0%
  43. 112 Mongolia 0.0%
  44. 112 Morocco 0.0%
  45. 112 Mozambique 0.0% compare
  46. 112 Netherlands 0.0%
  47. 112 New Zealand 0.0%
  48. 112 Nicaragua 0.0%
  49. 112 Niger 0.0%
  50. 112 Nigeria 0.0% compare
  51. 112 North Macedonia 0.0%
  52. 112 Norway 0.0%
  53. 112 Panama 0.0%
  54. 112 Philippines 0.0%
  55. 112 Poland 0.0%
  56. 112 Romania 0.0%
  57. 112 Russian Federation 0.0%
  58. 112 Senegal 0.0%
  59. 112 Serbia 0.0% compare
  60. 112 Slovakia 0.0%
  61. 112 Solomon Islands 0.0% compare
  62. 112 South Africa 0.0%
  63. 112 Spain 0.0%
  64. 112 Sudan 0.0%
  65. 112 Sweden 0.0%
  66. 112 Tanzania, United Republic of 0.0%
  67. 112 Thailand 0.0%
  68. 112 Türkiye 0.0%
  69. 112 Ukraine 0.0%
  70. 112 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0.0%
  71. 112 United States of America 0.0%
  72. 112 Uruguay 0.0% compare
  73. 112 Uzbekistan 0.0%
  74. 112 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 0.0%
  75. 112 Viet Nam 0.0%
  76. 112 Zambia 0.0% compare

See the full ranking of 232 places →

More economy & growth data for Eritrea

All data for Eritrea →

Frequently asked questions

What is adjusted savings: net forest depletion in Eritrea?
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion in Eritrea was 0.0% in 2011, according to Staff estimates, World Bank (WB).
What is the highest adjusted savings: net forest depletion recorded in Eritrea?
The highest recorded value was 8.7% in 1995.
What is the lowest adjusted savings: net forest depletion recorded in Eritrea?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2009.
How does Eritrea rank for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
Eritrea ranks 112th out of 185 countries with data for 2011.
Is adjusted savings: net forest depletion rising or falling in Eritrea?
Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Eritrea data come from?
The figures come from Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as part of Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adjusted savings: net forest depletion in Eritrea. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/stat/adjusted-savings-net-forest-depletion-percent-of-gni/eritrea/">Adjusted savings: net forest depletion in Eritrea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI)
Unit
% of GNI
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
232 places, 10,038 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.