Eritrea vs Zambia: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Eritrea
- Zambia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.8% | 6.5% | 0.3% | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 2.8% | 6.2% | 3.4% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.7% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Eritrea or Zambia?
- Eritrea, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Eritrea and Zambia?
- 0.0%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Zambia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Zambia rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Eritrea ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.