Eritrea vs Lithuania: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Eritrea
- Lithuania
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 112th and Lithuania ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.3% | 1.0% | 6.3% | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 2.8% | 0.1% | 2.7% | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Eritrea or Lithuania?
- Eritrea, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Lithuania as of 2011.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Eritrea and Lithuania?
- 0.0%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Lithuania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Lithuania rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Eritrea ranks 112th and Lithuania ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.