Ecuador vs Eritrea: Adjusted savings: net forest depletion
Adjusted savings: net forest depletion over time
- Ecuador
- Eritrea
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Eritrea, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Ecuador ranks 112th and Eritrea ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8% | 6.8% | 6.0% | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.3% | 2.8% | 2.5% | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adjusted savings: net forest depletion, Ecuador or Eritrea?
- Ecuador, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Eritrea as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adjusted savings: net forest depletion between Ecuador and Eritrea?
- 0.0%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eritrea?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Ecuador and Eritrea rank globally for adjusted savings: net forest depletion?
- Ecuador ranks 112th and Eritrea ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net forest depletion is calculated as the product of unit resource rents and the excess of roundwood harvest over natural growth. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross National Income (GNI) which is the total income earned by all residents within an economic territory during an accounting period. It is equal to gross domestic product plus earned income receivable from abroad minus earned income payable abroad.