South Africa vs Uzbekistan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

South Africa
8,991 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Uzbekistan
8,734 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Africa rank
10th
Uzbekistan rank
13th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • South Africa
  • Uzbekistan
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197019952021

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 8,991 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,734 current US$ per square kilometre in Uzbekistan, a difference of 257 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1992 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 10th and Uzbekistan ranks 13th of 216 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 766.69 current US$ per square kilometre 122.86 current US$ per square kilometre 643.84 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 1,426 current US$ per square kilometre 782.99 current US$ per square kilometre 643.25 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 2,779 current US$ per square kilometre 4,644 current US$ per square kilometre 1,865 current US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan
2020s 5,898 current US$ per square kilometre 7,534 current US$ per square kilometre 1,636 current US$ per square kilometre Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, South Africa or Uzbekistan?
South Africa, at 8,991 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,734 current US$ per square kilometre in Uzbekistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between South Africa and Uzbekistan?
257 current US$ per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uzbekistan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2021.
How do South Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
South Africa ranks 10th and Uzbekistan ranks 13th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Uzbekistan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/uzbekistan/">South Africa vs Uzbekistan: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.