Panama vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square

Panama
10,644 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
South Africa
8,991 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Panama rank
8th
South Africa rank
10th

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square over time

  • Panama
  • South Africa
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k197019952021

How they compare

Panama currently reports 10,644 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,991 current US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 1,653 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was South Africa ahead.

Panama ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 10th of 216 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama South Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 248.1 current US$ per square kilometre 248.1 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 0 current US$ per square kilometre 1,704 current US$ per square kilometre 1,704 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 4.06 current US$ per square kilometre 837.64 current US$ per square kilometre 833.58 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 32.66 current US$ per square kilometre 1,426 current US$ per square kilometre 1,394 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 333.54 current US$ per square kilometre 2,779 current US$ per square kilometre 2,445 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 5,844 current US$ per square kilometre 5,898 current US$ per square kilometre 54.75 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square, Panama or South Africa?
Panama, at 10,644 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,991 current US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2021.
What is the difference in adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square between Panama and South Africa?
1,653 current US$ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and South Africa?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Panama and South Africa rank globally for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
Panama ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 10th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/panama/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/adjusted-savings-mineral-depletion-current-us-per-square-kilometre/panama/south-africa/">Panama vs South Africa: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 10,348 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.