Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Cuba
Cuba: Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square was 3,895 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021. ◆ Volatile
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Cuba, 1970–2021
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2021, adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Cuba stood at 3,895 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 444.6% on the previous year and up 109.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Cuba peaked at 10,760 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007 and was at its lowest, 4.63 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1986.
Cuba ranks 26th of 216 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Cuba, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 83.68 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 80.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1972 | 86.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1973 | 89.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1974 | 92.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1975 | 117.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.4% |
| 1976 | 144.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 1977 | 133.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 1978 | 56.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.7% |
| 1979 | 118.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +109.1% |
| 1980 | 148.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1981 | 102.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.0% |
| 1982 | 22.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.4% |
| 1983 | 21.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1984 | 29.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 1985 | 44.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.7% |
| 1986 | 4.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.6% |
| 1987 | 10.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +125.4% |
| 1988 | 687.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +6482.6% |
| 1989 | 689.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1990 | 235.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.8% |
| 1991 | 270.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1992 | 201.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.7% |
| 1993 | 87.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.6% |
| 1994 | 32.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.4% |
| 1995 | 102.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +220.7% |
| 1996 | 306.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +198.7% |
| 1997 | 180.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.2% |
| 1998 | 54.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.1% |
| 1999 | 119.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +120.6% |
| 2000 | 663.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +456.6% |
| 2001 | 274.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.7% |
| 2002 | 406.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.4% |
| 2003 | 887.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +118.1% |
| 2004 | 1,614 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.9% |
| 2005 | 1,485 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 2006 | 3,099 current US$ per square kilometre | +108.7% |
| 2007 | 10,760 current US$ per square kilometre | +247.2% |
| 2008 | 1,659 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.6% |
| 2009 | 1,011 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.1% |
| 2010 | 2,060 current US$ per square kilometre | +103.7% |
| 2011 | 1,857 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.9% |
| 2012 | 689.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.9% |
| 2013 | 102.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.2% |
| 2014 | 364.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +256.9% |
| 2015 | 238.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.6% |
| 2016 | 50.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.9% |
| 2017 | 181.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +260.0% |
| 2018 | 813.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +348.8% |
| 2019 | 708.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2020 | 715.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2021 | 3,895 current US$ per square kilometre | +444.6% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 3,895 current US$ per square kilometre is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.999 current US$ per square kilometre, 3898.6× the median. (58 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | +6482.6% | 10.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 687.61 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 100.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 56.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 144.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 176.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 689.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 159.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 306.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2,186 current US$ per square kilometre | 274.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 10,760 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 706.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 50.36 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,060 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2,305 current US$ per square kilometre | 715.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 3,895 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 23 Guatemala 4,215 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Kazakhstan 4,167 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Cote d'Ivoire 4,033 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Kyrgyzstan 3,773 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Iran 3,748 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Poland 3,699 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More economy & growth data for Cuba
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$) 25.1 % change on previous year (2020)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per 0.3885 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2020)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$), per 3,731 current US$ per person (2020)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU) 21.52 % change on previous year (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per 0.3885 current LCU per US$ of GDP (2020)
- General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU), per 24,524 current LCU per person (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) -7.43 % change on previous year (2024)
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) 0.2523 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP (2020)
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$) 2,335 constant 2015 US$ per person (2024)
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$) -3.88 % change on previous year (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Cuba?
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square in Cuba was 3,895 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 10,760 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- What is the lowest adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.63 current US$ per square kilometre in 1986.
- How does Cuba rank for adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square?
- Cuba ranks 26th out of 216 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current us$), per square rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 109.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.